How To Prove The Dealership Repair Was Negligent

Posted on March 9, 2022

A furious office worker smashing her laptop. — Employers are generally liable under the doctrine of negligent hiring when one of their employees causes harm to a 3rd party (for example, a customer)

In nearly states, employers are generally liable under the doctrine of negligent hiring when 1 of their employees causes impairment to a third party (for example, a customer) and the employer knew or should have known of the employee's risk to cause harm. Employers are also liable if an employee causes injury and the employer would have discovered an employee's potential adventure of harm if it conducted a reasonable investigation.

While most states recognize a cause of action for negligent hiring (equally generally outlined above), state laws differ a scrap when it comes to specific standards for liability. For example, California law says that employers are liable if their negligence was a "substantial factor" in causing a victim's damage. In contrast, Rhode Isle law does not impose a substantial factor test and imposes liability simply if an employer did not exercise reasonable care in selecting a competent employee.

"Victims' in these cases can file negligent hiring claims against employers for compensatory damages and possibly even punitive damages.

Note that employers can take certain steps to help avert liability under a state's negligent hiring laws, including:

conducting criminal groundwork checks of chore candidates (if authorized under state police),
including reference checks in a candidate's screening process, and
verifying a candidate'due south piece of work history.

one. What is negligent hiring?

Negligent hiring is a specific legal claim made by a person injured at the hands of an employer's employee. The injured party could exist a client of the employer or a coworker of the harmful worker.

In bringing these claims, injury victims affirm that an employer is liable for their injuries provided that the employer knew or should take known of the employee'due south risk to crusade impairment prior to staffing the harmful worker.¹

These claims are based on a state'due south "negligent hiring, supervision, and memory laws."

Examples of causes of actions in these cases include:

a limousine visitor hiring a driver with a criminal tape of sexual bombardment and sexual harassment and the driver commits sexual attack on a passenger.
a eating house employing a delivery commuter with a horrendous driving tape, and the driver negligently injures another motorist when making a delivery.
a nursing abode overlooking a task applicant'southward criminal history of assault, and the bidder/employee later on commits elder abuse on a resident.

2. Practice unlike states have different negligent hiring laws?

Negligent hiring laws do slightly differ among some states. The main difference is that some states use different standards for determining when an employer is liable for an employee's deportment or an employee's unfitness.

For example, California law uses a four-part test for imposing liability. Co-ordinate to this standard, a plaintiff must bear witness the following to bear witness that a defendant employer was negligent in hiring, supervising, or retaining an employee:

the employee was unfit or incompetent to perform the work for which he/she was hired,
the defendant knew or should take known that the employee was unfit or incompetent and that it created a item take chances of harm to others,
the employee'south unfitness or incompetence harmed the plaintiff, and
the accused's negligence in hiring, supervising, or retaining the employee was a substantial cistron in causing the plaintiff'southward impairment.²

In contrast, Rhode Island law chooses non to impose any blazon of "substantial factor" requirement for liability. The law rather states that an employer is liable under a theory of negligent hiring if it:

hires, supervises, or retains an employee, and
does and so with knowledge of the employee's unfitness, or afterward failing to use reasonable care to detect the unfitness.³

Further, Florida law treats the state of affairs a bit differently. The state says at that place is a presumption against negligent hiring if the employer conducted thorough groundwork checks/background screenings into an employee'southward background during the hiring process.^iv

Notation that other state laws focus on foreseeability, or whether an employer should have been able to foresee if a potential employee posed a threat to others or was probable to engage in dangerous conduct.

A man wearing a neck brace as well as a cast on his arm, speaking with his attorney regarding his claim.

If an injury victim is successful in bringing a negligent hiring merits, that party is entitled to compensation for his/her losses.

3. What are the damages in a successful negligent hiring merits?

If an injury victim is successful in bringing a negligent hiring claim, that party is entitled to compensation for his/her losses.

"Compensation" includes the employer (or its insurer) paying the victim for such items as:

medical expenses and medical bills,
lost wages,
future lost earning capacity,
property damage,
out-of-pocket expenses,
pain and suffering,
disfigurement, and/or
reduced quality of life.

Further, a plaintiff may try and recover castigating damages in cases where a accused's conduct was particularly wanton or reckless. Punitive damages aim to punish defendants and prevent similar acts in the hereafter.

4. How can an employer avoid liability?

At that place are several steps that an employer can take to help avoid liability for negligent hiring, supervision, and negligent retentiveness. Some of these include an employer:

conducting pre-employment groundwork checks and/or criminal background checks of chore candidates (if authorized under state law),⁵
including reference checks in a candidate's screening process,
reviewing a potential employee's social media accounts,
verifying a candidate's work history,
increasing the scope of a pre-employment investigation when making hiring decisions for positions where there is a greater take chances of harm to the public or to co-workers,
exercising a greater level of due diligence and using a more stringent duty of intendance when conducting hiring practices, and
documenting all pre-employment investigatory efforts.

Employers that are unsure of the effectiveness of their hiring procedures should contact an experienced employment attorney for legal advice.

About the Author

Author Avatar

Neil Shouse

A former Los Angeles prosecutor, attorney Neil Shouse graduated with honors from UC Berkeley and Harvard Police force School (and completed boosted graduate studies at MIT). He has been featured on CNN, Good Morning America, Dr Phil, Court Television receiver, The Today Show and Court TV. Mr Shouse has been recognized by the National Trial Lawyers equally 1 of the Top 100 Criminal and Top 100 Civil Attorneys.